EU Redefines Defense Spending to Boost Military Readiness

New Defense Spending Rules Aim to Strengthen Europe’s Security

The European Union (EU) has rapidly redefined its classification of defense spending, significantly broadening the scope to allow for increased military investments. This shift comes as a response to mounting security threats, particularly from Russia’s aggression on Europe’s eastern flank and concerns over the long-term commitment of the United States to European security. By revising the definition, the EU seeks to mobilize hundreds of billions of euros to fortify its military preparedness and enhance the bloc’s overall defense capabilities.

Why the EU Changed Its Definition of Defense Spending

Previously, the EU maintained a strict and narrow definition of what constituted defense spending. Only the purchase of military hardware, such as tanks, aircraft, and weapons, was classified under this category. Other crucial aspects, such as investments in ammunition production, training personnel, and even salaries for soldiers, were excluded from the defense budget.

This restrictive definition created obstacles for EU nations to modernize and expand their military forces. For example, Poland encountered a setback when it sought to classify the construction of a €1.3 billion ammunition plant as defense spending, only to find that under previous EU rules, it was categorized as a construction project rather than a military investment.

However, with the new definition, the EU aims to rectify these limitations by allowing for broader classifications of military-related expenses. The updated framework grants the 27 member states a four-year exemption from EU deficit limits, permitting them to significantly increase their defense budgets without breaching fiscal constraints.

The EU unveiled its "White Paper" on defense and the "ReArm/Readiness 2030" plan, a roadmap to strengthen European security, as announced by the European Commission. Ursula von der Leyen noted a persistent lack of investment in Europe’s military capabilities, prompting the "White…

— Aleksandar Djokic (Александар Джокич) (@polidemitolog) March 19, 2025

Broadening the Scope of Military Investments

Under the revised rules, defense spending will now include:

• Infrastructure Development: Investments in military-related infrastructure, such as ammunition factories, underground shelters, and more substantial roads and bridges designed to support the passage of heavy military vehicles.
• Personnel Costs: Training, hiring, and paying tank crews, pilots, and military mechanics.
• Dual-Use Goods: Equipment and technology that serve both military and civilian purposes, such as drones, satellites, helicopters, and radar systems.
• Cyber Defence: Military-specific cybersecurity initiatives to prevent cyber-attacks on defense networks and critical infrastructure.

These changes align the EU’s defense spending policies more closely with NATO’s standards, which require member states to allocate at least 2% of their GDP to military expenditure. However, while the broader classification provides more flexibility, it also questions how different nations interpret and apply these new rules.

Debates Over What Constitutes Defense Spending

While many EU nations have welcomed the expansion of the defense budget, it has also sparked debates regarding what should qualify as military spending.

Italy’s Push for Border Control to Be Included

Italy, for example, has proposed that expenses related to managing migration from North Africa should be categorized as defense spending. Its government argues that border security is a crucial aspect of national defense, particularly given the influx of migrants arriving by sea. However, EU officials dismissed this request, stating that border protection can only be classified as a defense if it involves military installations designed to prevent an invasion. Routine patrols and border security measures, such as those conducted by coast guards, will not be included under the new definition.

Spain’s Call to Include Climate Change Projects

Spain has also weighed in on the discussion, suggesting that climate change projects should be classified under defense spending. The Spanish government argues that climate-related threats, such as natural disasters and resource scarcity, pose significant risks to national security. However, the European Commission has rejected this proposal, maintaining that while climate change is an important global issue, it does not fall under the scope of military expenditures.

Cybersecurity: A Grey Area in Defense Spending

Cybersecurity remains another contested area. EU officials have clarified that the defense budget will not include general cybersecurity measures. However, suppose military-specific cybersecurity initiatives are undertaken, such as purchasing specialized computers or software designed to prevent cyber-attacks on defense networks. In that case, they will qualify as defense spending.

Implications for the EU’s Military Strategy

The reclassification of defense spending is expected to impact the EU’s military strategy profoundly. For decades, many European nations have underinvested in their armed forces, relying heavily on NATO, particularly the U.S., for security guarantees. With increasing geopolitical tensions, including conflicts in Ukraine and growing concerns over potential threats from adversarial nations, Europe is now taking steps to strengthen its military capabilities.

By allowing for a more flexible definition of defense spending, the EU hopes to achieve several key objectives:

• Enhancing Military Readiness: Increased investment in defense infrastructure, personnel, and technology will improve the overall preparedness of EU forces.
• Reducing Dependency on External Allies: By boosting domestic military spending, EU nations aim to reduce their reliance on NATO and the United States for security.
• Accelerating Defence Projects: The new classification allows for faster approvals of critical military projects previously slowed down by restrictive budget rules.
• Encouraging Greater Cooperation Among Member States: A more unified approach to defense spending can lead to greater collaboration on joint military initiatives, intelligence sharing, and coordinated defense strategies.

Challenges and Future Considerations

While the revised definition of defense spending marks a significant shift, challenges remain. Differences in interpretation among EU member states could lead to inconsistencies in how funds are allocated. Additionally, political disagreements over what qualifies as defense spending may continue to arise, as seen with Italy’s and Spain’s proposals.

Furthermore, while the EU has granted a four-year exemption from deficit caps to encourage military investments, questions remain about what will happen once this period ends. Will the EU extend the exemption, or will countries have to scale back their defense spending to comply with fiscal rules again?

The EU’s decision to redefine defense spending reflects a strategic shift to strengthen its military capabilities in response to evolving security threats. By broadening the scope of defense expenditures, the bloc is taking necessary steps to modernize its armed forces and enhance its military readiness. However, ongoing debates and differing national interests highlight the complexities of implementing these changes.

As Europe navigates an increasingly uncertain geopolitical landscape, the success of this policy will depend on how effectively member states can balance fiscal responsibility with the need for robust defense investments. The EU must ensure that its new framework strengthens military readiness and fosters greater cooperation and unity among its members.